News · Defence & Security
Eritrean troops move deep into Ethiopia's Tigray region as fighting escalates - BBC
Tigray is a region in northern Ethiopia. Adigrat is a town near the Eritrean border. Mekelle is Tigray’s main city, about 115km south of Adigrat. Mekelle was under Ethiopian army control after TPLF forces withdrew over the weekend. In this report, “deep” means Eritrean troops allegedly moved beyond the border area and into central Tigray. Residents described convoys passing through Adigrat toward Edaga Hamus, a town between Adigrat and Mekelle. Reports also mentioned Wukro, another town along the corridor. The movement matters because it suggests a wider military presence inside the region, not only activity at the frontier. The BBC could not independently verify the reports. Still, several residents and sources described trucks, heavy weapons, and soldiers moving south. Eritrean involvement also revives memories of the 2020–2022 war and raises fears of a broader conflict.
Based on reporting by Africa News
What is Tigray, where are Adigrat and Mekelle, and what does it mean for Eritrean troops to move “deep” into the region?
Tigray is a region in northern Ethiopia. Adigrat is a town near the Eritrean border. Mekelle is Tigray’s main city, about 115km south of Adigrat. Mekelle was under Ethiopian army control after TPLF forces withdrew over the weekend.
In this report, “deep” means Eritrean troops allegedly moved beyond the border area and into central Tigray. Residents described convoys passing through Adigrat toward Edaga Hamus, a town between Adigrat and Mekelle. Reports also mentioned Wukro, another town along the corridor.
The movement matters because it suggests a wider military presence inside the region, not only activity at the frontier. The BBC could not independently verify the reports. Still, several residents and sources described trucks, heavy weapons, and soldiers moving south. Eritrean involvement also revives memories of the 2020–2022 war and raises fears of a broader conflict.
How large are the reported Eritrean troop movements, and how reliable is the evidence behind the reports?
Reported troop movements varied in size. One Adigrat resident saw about 40 trucks carrying soldiers. Another saw 20 to 30 large trucks heading toward Edaga Hamus. A source in Mekelle said relatives described up to 60 trucks, with troops later deployed in nearby mountainous terrain.
The reports also described trucks with Eritrean registration plates, soldiers travelling on foot, and vehicles carrying heavy weapons, including anti-aircraft guns. Social media images appeared to show loaded military trucks moving toward Adigrat, Edaga Hamus, and possibly Wukro. These details suggest more than a small border patrol.
However, the evidence has limits. Multiple residents and sources gave accounts, but the BBC could not independently verify the reported movements. The BBC also could not independently verify the social media images. Its limited access to Tigray makes the size and exact location of the forces uncertain.
Who are the main forces involved—the Ethiopian national army, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, and Eritrea—and what side has each taken?
The Ethiopian national army is the federal force controlling Mekelle after TPLF forces withdrew. The Tigray People’s Liberation Front, or TPLF, controls Tigray’s regional political structure and is linked to the regional forces opposing the national army. Fighting resumed after months of tension between the federal government and the TPLF.
Eritrea was a key ally of Ethiopia during the 2020–2022 war. Its forces fought against the TPLF. In the renewed conflict, Ethiopian officials accuse Eritrea of direct participation, while the reported troop movements suggest Eritrean soldiers are again operating inside Tigray. The article does not establish every force’s exact battlefield position.
The roles are therefore clear historically but contested now. The TPLF withdrew from Mekelle, while the national army and allied fighters entered Wukro, according to sources. Eritrea’s alleged return could alter the fighting and deepen tensions between the neighbouring governments. Eritrea has previously denied backing the TPLF, while Ethiopia now accuses it of involvement.
What happened during the 2020–2022 Tigray war, and what did the 2022 agreement intend to end?
The Tigray war lasted from 2020 to 2022 and became one of the most deadly conflicts of this century, according to the article. Eritrea supported landlocked Ethiopia, and Eritrean forces fought against the TPLF. The conflict drove Tigray to the precipice of famine and left residents with memories of alleged atrocities.
A 2022 deal ended the two-year civil war. Its central purpose was to stop the fighting between Ethiopia’s national government and the TPLF-led regional side. The agreement represented a move away from open warfare, even though the article does not detail all of its provisions.
That settlement is now under strain. Fighting restarted after months of tension, and both the Ethiopian government and the TPLF blame the other for violating the agreement. Eritrean troop movements, if confirmed, could make the breakdown more dangerous by bringing back a major former combatant and increasing regional tensions.
What could happen to civilians and to the wider Horn of Africa if Eritrean troops become directly involved in the renewed fighting?
For civilians, renewed Eritrean involvement could mean greater danger, displacement, and disruption in towns already affected by war. Tigray residents told the BBC that seeing Eritrean soldiers again was emotionally distressing because memories of alleged atrocities remain fresh. The earlier conflict pushed the region to the precipice of famine.
The reported movements include soldiers, heavy weapons, and possible drone strikes near Edaga Hamus. Fighting around Wukro also involved an exchange of heavy weapons. These developments could expose civilians to combat along the corridor between Adigrat and Mekelle, although the article does not confirm the full scale of harm.
The wider risk is regional escalation. Ethiopia and Eritrea severed diplomatic relations after renewed fighting raised fears of a broader conflict. Eritrean participation could deepen the confrontation between the two states and destabilise neighbouring areas. The article does not predict an outcome, but it shows why residents and officials view the reported return with alarm.
Why have Ethiopia’s relations with Eritrea deteriorated, especially over Ethiopia’s interest in controlling a Red Sea port?
The article links the deterioration mainly to Ethiopia’s ambition to take ownership of one of Eritrea’s Red Sea ports. Eritrea and Ethiopia were once military allies against the TPLF, but their relationship later worsened. The port issue became a major source of tension between the neighbouring governments.
Ethiopia is described as landlocked, meaning it has no coastline or seaport of its own. Access to an Eritrean port could give Ethiopia a direct route for overseas trade and reduce reliance on arrangements outside its territory. Seeking ownership, rather than simply access, makes the dispute especially sensitive because it touches Eritrea’s territory and sovereignty.
The political consequences are already visible in the article. Ethiopia and Eritrea severed diplomatic relations last week as fighting resumed. Their disagreement over the port now overlaps with military accusations and reported troop movements. That combination makes a local conflict in Tigray harder to separate from broader relations between the two states.
What does it mean for Ethiopia to be landlocked, and how can dependence on neighboring countries’ ports shape a country’s security and foreign policy?
A landlocked country has no direct coastline. Ethiopia therefore cannot send or receive overseas cargo through a port inside its own borders. It must use routes through neighbouring countries, making transport, customs, and political agreements with those neighbours especially important. This definition is established geographic knowledge; the article identifies Ethiopia as landlocked but does not detail its trade system.
Port dependence creates a practical mechanism for foreign-policy pressure. A neighbouring government can influence access, fees, routes, or security conditions. Ethiopia’s interest in owning an Eritrean Red Sea port reflects a desire for stronger control over a crucial external connection. Ownership would be more direct than relying only on another country’s permission.
That dependence can also affect military strategy and diplomacy. Port access may become tied to sovereignty disputes and regional alliances. In this case, the article connects Ethiopia’s port ambition with worsening relations, severed diplomatic ties, and renewed fighting in Tigray. The port issue therefore extends beyond commerce into security and regional politics.
Key Facts:
📌 Tigray is a region in northern Ethiopia.
📌 Adigrat lies about 115km north of Mekelle.
📌 Residents reported Eritrean convoys moving toward central Tigray.
📌 Residents reported convoys of 20 to 60 trucks.
📌 One witness saw about 40 trucks carrying soldiers.
📌 The BBC could not independently verify the troop movements.
📌 Ethiopian forces control Mekelle after the TPLF withdrew.