News · Health & Medicine

Government mulls covering childbirth-related lab test costs

Government mulls covering childbirth-related lab test costs

The proposal would make basic laboratory services free for women giving birth at hospitals covered by the Ama Programme. The Ama Programme is part of Nepal’s wider Safe Motherhood Programme. This matters because institutional delivery is officially free, yet required tests can still leave poor women unable to receive hospital care. The revised guideline sets proposed coverage at Rs1,845 per woman. It is intended to cover basic tests needed around delivery, including laboratory work linked to childbirth. The proposal followed public anger after Babita Kumari Paswan gave birth outside Rajbiraj’s Gajendra Narayan Singh Hospital when her family could not pay for blood tests. The plan is not yet approved. Officials say hospitals currently receive no government reimbursement for laboratory services. Some facilities pay from their own funds, but others do not. Approval could make basic testing more consistent, although it would not cover every required test, whose total cost officials estimate at over Rs8,000.

Based on reporting by Kathmandu Post Nepal

What childbirth-related laboratory tests is the government proposing to cover, and who would receive them?

The proposal would make basic laboratory services free for women giving birth at hospitals covered by the Ama Programme. The Ama Programme is part of Nepal’s wider Safe Motherhood Programme. This matters because institutional delivery is officially free, yet required tests can still leave poor women unable to receive hospital care.

The revised guideline sets proposed coverage at Rs1,845 per woman. It is intended to cover basic tests needed around delivery, including laboratory work linked to childbirth. The proposal followed public anger after Babita Kumari Paswan gave birth outside Rajbiraj’s Gajendra Narayan Singh Hospital when her family could not pay for blood tests.

The plan is not yet approved. Officials say hospitals currently receive no government reimbursement for laboratory services. Some facilities pay from their own funds, but others do not. Approval could make basic testing more consistent, although it would not cover every required test, whose total cost officials estimate at over Rs8,000.

How much would the proposed coverage pay for, and how does that compare with the more than Rs8,000 cost of all required tests?

The government’s proposal would fund laboratory services worth Rs1,845 for women using participating hospital delivery services. Officials describe this amount as enough for basic tests, not the complete package of tests that pregnant women may require. The distinction matters because free delivery does not automatically mean free testing.

Officials estimate that carrying out all required tests costs more than Rs8,000. Compared with that figure, Rs1,845 is under one-quarter of the total estimated cost. A family could therefore still face substantial expenses if doctors require tests beyond the proposed basic package.

The proposal reflects the government’s limited budget. The Family Welfare Division says it cannot currently provide every test free of charge. If approved, the payment would reduce the initial burden and may help women reach hospitals, but it would not eliminate all test-related costs unless funding later expands.

Why did a woman in labour give birth outside Rajbiraj hospital even though institutional deliveries are officially free?

Institutional delivery services were declared free at state-run hospitals and other approved facilities, but the policy did not include laboratory testing. Hospitals were reimbursed for delivery care, not for the tests women might need before giving birth. That gap made the promise of free delivery incomplete for families without money.

In Rajbiraj, Babita Kumari Paswan, 30, went into labour at Gajendra Narayan Singh Hospital on September 9. Her husband could not afford the blood-test costs. She consequently gave birth on a pavement outside the state-owned hospital. Hospital workers said they were following the process used there for years.

The incident exposed both a policy failure and problems in care. Investigations by the Health Ministry and Nepal Medical Council blamed the lack of free laboratory services, while one report also cited inhumane behaviour by some health workers and security guards. The proposal seeks to address the funding gap, but approval is still pending.

What could change for poor pregnant women if the proposal is approved?

Approval could remove a major financial barrier for poor pregnant women seeking hospital deliveries. They would be more likely to receive basic laboratory tests without delaying care or being turned away because their families lacked cash. This matters especially during emergencies, when the article says women can still be left without required tests.

The Rajbiraj case shows the mechanism clearly. Babita Kumari Paswan’s husband could not pay for blood tests, and she gave birth outside Gajendra Narayan Singh Hospital. Under the proposal, the hospital could provide basic tests worth Rs1,845 through the Ama Programme rather than requiring the family to pay those costs directly.

The change would not solve every problem. Officials estimate all required tests cost over Rs8,000, and the proposal covers only basic services. It also needs approval and a reimbursement system. If adopted, it could make hospital delivery policy more practical and reduce similar failures, while further funding would be needed for complete testing.

What is Nepal’s Ama Programme, and how does the government reimburse hospitals for normal, complicated, and cesarean deliveries?

The Ama Programme, also called the mother scheme, supports free institutional delivery in Nepal. It operates within the broader Safe Motherhood Programme. The Ministry of Health and Population reimburses participating health facilities for delivery services, helping hospitals provide care without charging women for the delivery itself.

The reimbursement depends on the type of birth. A facility receives Rs2,500 for a normal delivery, Rs4,000 for a complicated delivery, and Rs10,000 for a cesarean section. The hospital must also give Rs300 from the reimbursement to the nurses involved in each delivery. These payments are intended to support facilities that provide institutional maternity care.

The programme covers delivery services, but laboratory testing remains a gap. Hospitals are not currently reimbursed by the government for lab services. Some facilities pay those costs themselves, while others do not. The proposed Rs1,845 in free basic tests would extend the programme’s practical support, but it has not been approved.

How have free delivery services, transport allowances, and antenatal-care incentives changed institutional delivery rates and maternal deaths in Nepal?

Nepal combined free institutional delivery with transportation allowances and cash incentives for antenatal checkups. These measures encouraged women to travel to health centres and hospitals instead of giving birth elsewhere. The programme therefore expanded access by reducing both delivery and travel-related financial barriers.

The change in use was substantial. The institutional delivery rate was around 16 percent when free delivery was declared in 2009. It later increased to more than 90 percent. The article credits the programme’s free treatment, transport support, and antenatal incentives with helping bring women into formal health facilities.

Health outcomes improved as well. Nepal’s maternal mortality rate fell from 539 per 100,000 births in 1996 to 239 per 100,000 in 2016. The country received a Millennium Development Goals award for this progress. A World Health Organisation report says maternal deaths have fallen by more than 70 percent since 2000, though maternity-related deaths continue.

Why does declaring healthcare a fundamental right require governments to fund not only treatment but also tests, staff, transport, and hospital reimbursement?

Nepal’s constitution calls health a fundamental right, and its National Health Policy promises equitable access to high-quality care. That promise covers more than the moment of treatment. If required tests remain unaffordable, a woman may be unable to enter or complete the care system, even when delivery itself is officially free.

The Rajbiraj incident demonstrates the problem. Babita Kumari Paswan’s husband could not pay for blood tests, and she gave birth outside the hospital. The hospital could provide a delivery service under the existing programme, but the policy did not fund laboratory work. Staff, supplies, transport, and hospital reimbursement are all practical parts of making healthcare available.

Funding these connected needs makes rights enforceable in everyday life. Nepal already reimburses facilities for deliveries and provides transport support in some circumstances, including helicopter services in fragile mountain areas. The proposed lab payment could close one gap, but officials say neither current programme addresses testing costs fully.

Key Facts:

📌 Proposed free laboratory services would be worth Rs1,845.

📌 The coverage targets women delivering under the Ama Programme.

📌 The proposal has not yet received approval.

📌 The proposed coverage is Rs1,845.

📌 All required tests cost officials more than Rs8,000.

📌 The proposal would cover less than one-quarter of that estimate.

📌 Babita Kumari Paswan gave birth on a hospital pavement.

More on JupiteX