News · History & Heritage

For children: Dhiman looks for his journalist father who disappears during the 1971 liberation war

For children: Dhiman looks for his journalist father who disappears during the 1971 liberation war

Bijoy Lahiri travelled to East Pakistan because the Border Security Forces invited members of the national press corps to Calcutta Press Club. The invitation gave no location and promised to take journalists somewhere. Ujjal, a senior correspondent, suspected a secret mission and asked Bijoy to join him. Bijoy also saw the trip as a chance to gain recognition and seek a better post. He left before first light and returned close to midnight. At home, he removed his spectacles, rubbed his tired eyes, and grinned at Dhiman and Priti. He then revealed the destination: East Pakistan. Dhiman immediately connected it with the war he had heard about. The article does not describe everything Bijoy witnessed there. It establishes that the trip took him into a conflict zone and gave him firsthand experience. His journey also brought the political crisis into Dhiman’s family life, making distant events feel immediate and real.

Based on reporting by Scroll.in

Why did Dhiman’s father travel to East Pakistan, and what happened to him after he went there?

Bijoy Lahiri travelled to East Pakistan because the Border Security Forces invited members of the national press corps to Calcutta Press Club. The invitation gave no location and promised to take journalists somewhere. Ujjal, a senior correspondent, suspected a secret mission and asked Bijoy to join him. Bijoy also saw the trip as a chance to gain recognition and seek a better post.

He left before first light and returned close to midnight. At home, he removed his spectacles, rubbed his tired eyes, and grinned at Dhiman and Priti. He then revealed the destination: East Pakistan. Dhiman immediately connected it with the war he had heard about.

The article does not describe everything Bijoy witnessed there. It establishes that the trip took him into a conflict zone and gave him firsthand experience. His journey also brought the political crisis into Dhiman’s family life, making distant events feel immediate and real.

What was East Pakistan, and why was it the main setting of the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War?

East Pakistan was the eastern part of Pakistan from 1947 to 1971. It lay east of India, while West Pakistan lay to India’s west. The two wings were separated by roughly 1,600 kilometres of Indian territory. East Pakistan had a Bengali-speaking majority and developed strong demands for political autonomy and democratic representation.

It became the main setting of the Bangladesh Liberation War because the Awami League won the 1970 national election decisively in East Pakistan. Pakistan’s central authorities delayed transferring power to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the party’s leader. Protests and civil resistance followed. The army then attempted to restore central control through violent repression, including Operation Searchlight.

That crackdown transformed a constitutional dispute into an armed independence struggle. Bengali nationalist forces fought for Bangladesh, while millions of civilians were displaced. India later intervened militarily, and Pakistan’s forces surrendered in December 1971. East Pakistan became the independent country of Bangladesh.

How decisive was the Awami League’s victory in the 1970 election?

The Awami League’s victory was decisive. In East Pakistan, it won 160 of the 162 general seats and all seven women’s seats in the December 1970 election. That was not a narrow regional win. The party also became the largest party in Pakistan as a whole, both by seats and by votes.

These results mattered because they gave Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s party an absolute majority in the National Assembly. In a parliamentary system, that majority normally provides the authority to form the federal government. The election therefore gave the Awami League a democratic claim to national power, not merely a demand for influence in East Pakistan.

The result created a direct clash with Pakistan’s president and the Pakistan Peoples Party, which had won the majority in West Pakistan. Their refusal to hand over power blocked the normal constitutional process. That denial helped turn electoral frustration into mass unrest, repression, and eventually Bangladesh’s war for independence.

Why did Pakistan’s president and the ruling party in West Pakistan refuse to transfer power to the Awami League?

The immediate issue was power. The Awami League had won an absolute majority in the National Assembly, so transferring federal authority would have made Sheikh Mujibur Rahman the central political leader of Pakistan. Yahya Khan, the president ruling under martial law, delayed that transfer. Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s Pakistan Peoples Party, the leading party in West Pakistan, also opposed an Awami League-led federal government.

The article gives the basic fact but does not fully explain their private motives. Historically, the refusal reflected fears that Mujib’s autonomy program would weaken the centralized state and reduce West Pakistan’s political control. Bhutto also wanted a major role in national government despite not winning the overall election.

The refusal mattered because it overturned the expected constitutional result. Instead of allowing the electoral majority to govern, Pakistan’s rulers postponed power and deepened public anger. Negotiations failed, civil disobedience expanded, and the crisis moved from a dispute over government formation toward repression and independence.

What was Operation Searchlight, and whom did the Pakistan army target during it?

Operation Searchlight was the Pakistan army’s coordinated military crackdown, launched on March 25, 1971, to crush Bengali nationalism in East Pakistan. Its immediate aim was to end mass resistance and prevent the region from breaking away after the Awami League’s election victory was denied recognition.

The army targeted the movement’s political and social foundations. Troops attacked Awami League supporters, students, teachers, intellectuals, journalists, police, and Bengali soldiers. They also carried out widespread attacks in civilian neighborhoods, especially in Dhaka and other major cities. The campaign used arrests, killings, torture, and destruction to create fear and restore central control.

Instead, the operation intensified the conflict. It pushed many Bengalis toward armed resistance and made compromise far less likely. The resulting war produced enormous civilian suffering and refugee movements. India eventually intervened, and Pakistan’s defeat led to Bangladesh becoming independent in December 1971.

What happened because the army tried to suppress the Bengali nationalist movement?

The army’s attempt to suppress Bengali nationalism transformed a political crisis into a full-scale war. Violence destroyed trust in Pakistan’s central government and persuaded many Bengalis that ordinary constitutional politics could no longer secure their rights. The independence movement gained broader support as repression spread.

Resistance forces formed and fought the Pakistan army. Civilians fled their homes in enormous numbers, creating a refugee crisis in neighboring India. The conflict also generated international concern over the army’s atrocities. India supported the Bengali resistance and entered the war directly in December 1971.

Pakistan’s forces were defeated and surrendered in Dhaka on December 16, 1971. Bangladesh emerged as an independent state. The consequence therefore went far beyond restoring order: the military crackdown destroyed Pakistan’s unity, caused immense human suffering, and created a new country. The episode remains a major example of how repression can strengthen, rather than eliminate, a nationalist movement.

How can refusing to honor an election turn a political disagreement into a war for independence?

An election creates a peaceful way to decide who should govern. If authorities reject a clear result, they remove that peaceful route and make political power appear unreachable through normal institutions. The defeated side may then demand autonomy or independence rather than merely a new government.

That pattern unfolded in Pakistan after December 1970. The Awami League won an absolute majority, including 160 of East Pakistan’s 162 general seats and all seven women’s seats. Yet Yahya Khan’s government delayed transferring federal power to Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Protests grew, and the army’s violent crackdown made the dispute even more dangerous.

Once force replaced constitutional negotiation, resistance became armed. Bengali nationalists fought for a separate country, while civilians suffered killings and displacement. India later intervened, and Bangladesh emerged after Pakistan’s defeat. The lesson is not automatic: refusing an election does not always cause war, but it can remove compromise and make independence seem the only remaining path.

Key Facts:

📌 Bijoy travelled with senior correspondent Ujjal.

📌 The Border Security Forces arranged the press trip.

📌 He returned near midnight from East Pakistan.

📌 East Pakistan was Pakistan’s eastern wing before 1971.

📌 It was separated from West Pakistan by Indian territory.

📌 The independence war was fought mainly in East Pakistan.

📌 The Awami League won 160 of 162 general seats in East Pakistan.

More on JupiteX