News · Social Issues
ICE detainees in Georgia used the facility’s video calling software to expose the conditions inside
The four men used Folkston’s video-calling system to speak publicly from inside detention. They described an intentionally dysfunctional immigration court process that keeps people in federal custody for months or years. They also compared the facility to a prison, despite ICE detention officially being intended to ensure attendance at deportation hearings rather than punish crime. The men appeared in facility uniforms on low-resolution tablets. Idris Makhmudov said he had been detained for 27 months and counting. He also explained that detainee workers earn $1 a day, enough for only a 10-minute phone call. The video may have been recorded through an outside contact using the facility’s software. The release brought consequences. Samantha Hamilton said everyone shown was placed in segregation and faced retaliation. Afterward, 45 detainees signed an open letter about conditions, and an estimated 73 detainees began a hunger strike. The video turned a restricted communication tool into a channel for protest.
Based on reporting by The Verge Policy
What did the four ICE detainees reveal in the video made through the detention center’s calling system?
The four men used Folkston’s video-calling system to speak publicly from inside detention. They described an intentionally dysfunctional immigration court process that keeps people in federal custody for months or years. They also compared the facility to a prison, despite ICE detention officially being intended to ensure attendance at deportation hearings rather than punish crime.
The men appeared in facility uniforms on low-resolution tablets. Idris Makhmudov said he had been detained for 27 months and counting. He also explained that detainee workers earn $1 a day, enough for only a 10-minute phone call. The video may have been recorded through an outside contact using the facility’s software.
The release brought consequences. Samantha Hamilton said everyone shown was placed in segregation and faced retaliation. Afterward, 45 detainees signed an open letter about conditions, and an estimated 73 detainees began a hunger strike. The video turned a restricted communication tool into a channel for protest.
What is ICE detention, and how is it legally different from imprisonment as punishment for a crime?
ICE detention is custody for people involved in immigration or deportation proceedings. Its stated purpose is administrative: making sure someone appears at required hearings or remains available while the case proceeds. It is legally different from imprisonment, which is punishment imposed after a criminal conviction. Detention is not supposed to be punishment for a crime.
The distinction can be hard to see in practice. Folkston was previously a prison and has prison-like features, including uniforms, segregation, restricted movement, and controlled communication. Detainees also rely on expensive systems to contact family, lawyers, and people outside. These conditions make civil detention feel much like incarceration.
The difference matters because detention can continue without a criminal sentence. In the article, people remain held while immigration cases move through what the men call “deportation courts.” The system’s legal purpose is limited, but its real effects include prolonged confinement, lost income, costly communication, and possible retaliation for speaking publicly.
How large is the Folkston facility and how long can people remain detained there?
Folkston’s overall size is not stated in the provided article. The clearest scale figure is that each detainee pod contains 60 to 70 people. Each pod reportedly has only three or four tablets, leaving many detainees with very limited access to communication.
The article shows that detention can last far beyond a short wait. Idris Makhmudov said he had been held at Folkston for 27 months and counting. More broadly, the men said the immigration court system was designed to keep people in federal custody for months or years while their cases continue.
That combination matters. Even without a total facility population, the pod figures show crowded, restricted living conditions and scarce communication tools. The long detention example shows how immigration custody can become a years-long experience. The article does not provide a maximum detention period or a total number of people held at Folkston.
What happened to the people who appeared in the video, and what actions did other detainees take afterward?
The video carried immediate personal risks for the four men who appeared in it. Samantha Hamilton, an immigration attorney, said that everyone shown was placed in segregation after the video was released. She said they were facing retaliation and had expected that response.
The protest then spread beyond the original recording. Forty-five detainees wrote an open letter that gave more detail about conditions at Folkston. An estimated 73 detainees were also on hunger strike. Their actions created a wider public record of complaints from inside the facility.
These responses show how a communication system can become a tool for organizing and exposure. The men used limited access to video calling to reach people outside, while other detainees used writing and collective protest. The article does not state how long the segregation, letter campaign, or hunger strike lasted, or whether officials changed conditions afterward.
Why can people in immigration detention remain in custody for months or years while waiting for their cases to be decided?
People can remain in immigration detention because deportation proceedings may continue for months or years. The men in the video described the court system as intentionally dysfunctional and designed to keep them in federal custody. ICE says detention is meant to ensure people attend hearings, but the article presents prolonged custody as a central feature of the system they experience.
Idris Makhmudov said he had been detained at Folkston for 27 months and counting. The facility is privately owned and operated, so people can spend long periods there while their cases remain unresolved. Their confinement also creates demand for paid food, communication, and other services.
The article does not identify one specific legal delay or explain every person’s case. It does show the consequences of extended proceedings: years away from family, continued dependence on costly communication, and limited control over daily life. The men’s phrase “deportation courts” captures their view that the process is structured around removal rather than timely resolution.
How do private companies and the government financially benefit from operating detention centers and selling communication services to detainees?
Private companies earn money by operating detention centers and selling services inside them. Folkston is owned and operated by GEO Group, a publicly traded company. Detainees also must use GettingOut, software owned by Telmate, which is owned by ViaPath Technologies and ultimately by private equity firm American Securities.
The key mechanism is pay-to-communicate confinement. Detainees pay for messages, photos, phone calls, and video calls. In 2021, ViaPath charged 18 cents to $1.10 per minute. GettingOut accounts can forfeit unused money after 180 days of inactivity. GEO’s stock rose more than 75 percent after Trump’s 2024 reelection.
The article does not say that the government directly profits from these services. It does show government involvement through ICE detention and FCC rate rules. The FCC capped rates in 2024, then voted in 2025 to raise the cap by up to 83 percent. Private revenue therefore remains tied to public detention policy.
What are asylum, bond, parole, and deportation, and how do these options determine whether someone leaves immigration detention?
Asylum is protection sought by someone who fears serious persecution in their home country. Bond is money or another financial guarantee that may allow release while a case continues. Parole is temporary permission to leave immigration custody, often under specified conditions. Deportation is the government’s removal of a person from the country.
These options can determine whether someone leaves detention. A person granted asylum can remain with legal protection. Someone approved for bond or parole may leave custody while continuing the case. A person ordered deported may be removed, while someone who wins another form of relief may avoid deportation. Eligibility and decisions depend on the individual case.
The provided article does not explain asylum, bond, parole, or specific release procedures. It focuses on detention conditions and the court system. It states that ICE detention is meant to ensure attendance at hearings, but it does not identify which of the four men sought asylum, requested bond or parole, or received deportation orders.
Key Facts:
📌 Four detainees described prison-like conditions inside Folkston.
📌 Idris Makhmudov said he had been detained for 27 months.
📌 The video was made using the facility’s calling software.
📌 ICE detention is ostensibly meant to ensure attendance at deportation hearings.
📌 Folkston was a prison before becoming an immigration detention center.
📌 The facility is virtually indistinguishable from a prison.
📌 Each Folkston pod contains 60 to 70 detainees.