News · History & Heritage

Mutations of jihadism, “war on terror,” trial of the alleged mastermind… September 11, 2001, on the front pages of the international press

Mutations of jihadism, “war on terror,” trial of the alleged mastermind… September 11, 2001, on the front pages of the international press

On September 11, 2001, 19 al-Qaeda hijackers seized four commercial aircraft in the United States. They deliberately crashed two planes into New York’s World Trade Center towers and another into the Pentagon near Washington. The fourth plane crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Its passengers had tried to retake control. The attacks killed 2,977 people, excluding the hijackers, and caused the towers to collapse. They were designed to create mass casualties, destroy powerful symbols, and shock the United States and the wider world. The supplied headlines focus on the attacks’ continuing political, human, and historical impact. The consequences lasted far beyond that morning. The United States launched military operations in Afghanistan, expanded security and surveillance, and reshaped foreign policy. Twenty-five years later, the headlines still discuss victims’ messages, public memory, terrorism’s evolution, and debates over national unity and government power.

Based on reporting by Le Figaro

What happened in the September 11, 2001 attacks?

On September 11, 2001, 19 al-Qaeda hijackers seized four commercial aircraft in the United States. They deliberately crashed two planes into New York’s World Trade Center towers and another into the Pentagon near Washington. The fourth plane crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Its passengers had tried to retake control.

The attacks killed 2,977 people, excluding the hijackers, and caused the towers to collapse. They were designed to create mass casualties, destroy powerful symbols, and shock the United States and the wider world. The supplied headlines focus on the attacks’ continuing political, human, and historical impact.

The consequences lasted far beyond that morning. The United States launched military operations in Afghanistan, expanded security and surveillance, and reshaped foreign policy. Twenty-five years later, the headlines still discuss victims’ messages, public memory, terrorism’s evolution, and debates over national unity and government power.

What is jihadism, and how is it different from Islam as a religion?

Jihadism is a modern extremist ideology, not another name for Islam. It claims that violence, including attacks on civilians, can serve a political and religious project. Jihadists often present themselves as defenders of Muslims, but their interpretations are rejected by many Muslim scholars and communities.

In Islamic traditions, “jihad” can refer broadly to striving for moral improvement, defending a community, or other forms of effort. Its meaning depends on context and interpretation. Jihadism narrows and weaponizes the term. Groups such as al-Qaeda use selective religious language to recruit followers and legitimize political violence.

This distinction matters when discussing the September 11 attacks. Calling the attacks simply “Islamic” wrongly blames a whole religion for one extremist movement. The supplied headlines discuss mutations of jihadism, while also emphasizing the attacks’ human and political consequences. Counterterrorism therefore requires confronting violent networks without treating ordinary Muslim communities as enemies.

How many people were killed, how many planes were hijacked, and which major sites were attacked?

The September 11 attacks killed 2,977 victims, not counting the 19 hijackers. The death toll included passengers and crew members, people in the World Trade Center and Pentagon, firefighters, police officers, emergency workers, and others nearby. Thousands more suffered injuries or later illness.

Four commercial aircraft were hijacked. American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 struck the World Trade Center’s North and South Towers. American Airlines Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. United Airlines Flight 93 crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after passengers confronted the hijackers. These locations represented financial, military, and national power.

The scale explains why September 11 became a global turning point. The supplied headlines return to victims’ final messages, commemoration, and continuing political debate. The attacks prompted wars, new security systems, surveillance expansion, and international legal measures whose effects remain visible today.

Who were al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, and what role did they play in the attacks?

Al-Qaeda was a transnational militant organization that sought to attack the United States and its allies. Osama bin Laden was its founder and leader. He provided strategic direction, resources, recruitment, and public justification for major operations. Al-Qaeda’s leadership developed the September 11 plan over several years.

Nineteen operatives carried out the hijackings. Senior planners, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, helped develop the operation, while bin Laden approved and supported it. The plot used flight training, international travel, communications, financing, and careful preparation. Responsibility was therefore distributed across a wider organization, not limited to one individual.

This structure matters because the attacks became a case study in transnational terrorism. The supplied headlines refer to the “presumed mastermind” and to jihadism’s mutations. Bin Laden was killed by US forces in Pakistan in 2011, but al-Qaeda’s networks and ideas survived through affiliates and later inspired other extremists.

Why did the United States respond with a global “war on terror,” including military action in Afghanistan?

The United States responded with a global “war on terror” because 9/11 killed thousands and demonstrated that a non-state network could launch a major attack from abroad. US leaders identified al-Qaeda as responsible and argued that Afghanistan’s Taliban government was sheltering bin Laden and allowing the organization to operate. Military action was presented as self-defense and counterterrorism.

In October 2001, US-led forces attacked Afghanistan. They helped remove the Taliban government and disrupted al-Qaeda’s bases, while seeking bin Laden and other leaders. NATO also invoked collective-defense provisions after the attacks. The campaign soon expanded into a long war involving counterinsurgency, state-building, and conflict with the Taliban.

The result was complex. Al-Qaeda was weakened, but the Taliban eventually returned to power after US and allied forces withdrew in 2021. The supplied headlines connect 9/11 with the “war against terrorism” and later transformations of jihadism. The episode shows how military victories may not eliminate extremist movements or their causes.

What major changes did 9/11 cause in airport security, surveillance, foreign policy, and international law?

September 11 changed how states approached security. Airports introduced stricter passenger screening, identity checks, baggage controls, watchlists, and reinforced cockpit doors. In the United States, the Transportation Security Administration was created. Security moved from airlines toward centralized government oversight.

Surveillance also expanded. The USA PATRIOT Act broadened some investigative powers, while intelligence agencies increased information sharing, financial tracking, electronic monitoring, and international cooperation. Foreign policy adopted preventive counterterrorism, military intervention, detention operations, and targeted strikes. The United Nations strengthened rules against terrorist financing and required countries to cooperate against terrorist networks.

These changes produced trade-offs. They helped authorities share warnings and disrupt plots, but critics challenged secret surveillance, indefinite detention, torture, profiling, and weakened judicial safeguards. The supplied headlines show that 9/11 remains politically alive decades later. Future policy must balance public safety with privacy, accountability, lawful process, and careful use of military force.

How can a small, decentralized terrorist network organize attacks across borders, and why is it difficult for states to stop such networks?

A decentralized terrorist network does not need a large army. A leadership group can choose targets, provide money and training, and issue broad instructions. Separate cells then handle travel, housing, communications, and operations. Compartmentalization limits what each member knows, reducing the damage if one person is arrested.

Al-Qaeda used international recruitment, flight training, financial transfers, forged or ordinary documents, and cross-border movement. Some attackers lived for months in the target country and appeared unremarkable. That combination made the plot difficult to detect. Intelligence agencies may possess isolated clues without recognizing their connection or urgency.

States face further obstacles. Agencies and countries may not share information quickly, and evidence must cross legal systems. Aggressive surveillance can also damage trust and civil liberties. The supplied headlines’ focus on jihadism’s mutations points to an ongoing problem: networks change tactics, decentralize, and use affiliates or online propaganda. Effective prevention therefore requires intelligence cooperation, community trust, lawful investigations, and flexible analysis.

Key Facts:

📌 Nineteen al-Qaeda hijackers seized four commercial aircraft.

📌 Two planes struck the World Trade Center in New York.

📌 A fourth plane crashed in Pennsylvania after passenger resistance.

📌 Jihadism is an extremist ideology, not a synonym for Islam.

📌 Most Muslims reject terrorism and attacks on civilians.

📌 Jihadists selectively reinterpret religious concepts for political violence.

📌 September 11 killed 2,977 victims, excluding the hijackers.

More on JupiteX