The hidden alliances between India’s VCs, uncovered

The article focuses on how often Indian VCs co-invested during the past two years. It treats repeated co-investment as a sign of deeper relationships. Mapping these patterns can show founders which firms regularly move together when fundraising.

The article does not provide the chart’s individual names or counts in the supplied text. It does explain that the visualization is meant to expose hidden alliances and possible avoidance patterns. Founders can use those patterns to understand how India’s VC ecosystem behaves.

Therefore, a precise answer cannot be calculated from the provided source without inventing figures. The article describes an intricate network and gives access to charts, graphics, and visuals, but the excerpt contains no overall relationship count.

Because the names and frequencies are missing, supplying a ranking would be speculative. The article positions these details as premium visual content. A complete answer would require the omitted chart or table, rather than relying on the general description provided here.

This information would not guarantee funding, and the article does not claim that it does. It could still help founders prioritize introductions, understand possible syndicates, and avoid treating every VC as an isolated target. The past two years of data provide the strategic starting point.

Rare co-investment may simply reflect different investment strategies, networks, or preferred deal sizes. The article does not identify the causes of any specific alliance or avoidance pattern. It only shows that some firms often invest together while others tend to avoid each other.

The article’s central example is the shared funding relationship itself. It analyzes which Indian VCs repeatedly appear together in deals from the past two years. That network matters because founders may need to understand potential investor groups rather than approach firms one at a time.