JupiteX Get the app
Environment & Climate16 Oct 2026 · about 6 min

Haze watch: 29 areas recording unhealthy or worse air, Larkin, Pasir Gudang API hits 202

The brief

The most serious readings were recorded in Larkin and Pasir Gudang, Johor. Each station reached an API of 202 at 5.30pm. Under Malaysia's scale, that is very unhealthy air. The report also identified 27 other areas with unhealthy readings, showing that poor air quality affected many regions. Johor had several high readings beyond Larkin and Pasir Gudang. Pengerang recorded 181, Batu Pahat and Kota Tinggi each recorded 171, Kluang recorded 168, Tangkak 159, and Segamat 156. Outside Johor, Johan Setia in Selangor recorded 184, the highest reading below the very unhealthy threshold. Other high readings included Nilai at 181, Bandaraya Melaka at 180, and Seremban at 174. These figures show a broad regional problem rather than one isolated station. The article does not state how long the conditions would last, but continued monitoring through APIMS would show whether readings improve or worsen.

01

Which places recorded the worst air quality, and what were their API readings?

The most serious readings were recorded in Larkin and Pasir Gudang, Johor. Each station reached an API of 202 at 5.30pm. Under Malaysia's scale, that is very unhealthy air. The report also identified 27 other areas with unhealthy readings, showing that poor air quality affected many regions.

Johor had several high readings beyond Larkin and Pasir Gudang. Pengerang recorded 181, Batu Pahat and Kota Tinggi each recorded 171, Kluang recorded 168, Tangkak 159, and Segamat 156. Outside Johor, Johan Setia in Selangor recorded 184, the highest reading below the very unhealthy threshold.

Other high readings included Nilai at 181, Bandaraya Melaka at 180, and Seremban at 174. These figures show a broad regional problem rather than one isolated station. The article does not state how long the conditions would last, but continued monitoring through APIMS would show whether readings improve or worsen.

02

What is the Air Pollutant Index (API), and what does a reading of 202 mean?

The Air Pollutant Index, or API, is a number used to describe air quality in Malaysia. It turns air-pollution information into categories that are easier for the public to understand. The scale runs from good and moderate conditions to unhealthy, very unhealthy, and hazardous conditions. This matters because a single reading quickly communicates the seriousness of the air.

The article reports an API of 202 in both Larkin and Pasir Gudang at 5.30pm. Malaysia classifies readings from 201 to 300 as very unhealthy. Therefore, 202 is not merely unhealthy; it is the lowest value within the very unhealthy band. Readings from 101 to 200 are classified as unhealthy.

The article identifies APIMS as the source of the reported readings. It does not explain the technical calculation behind each API value. In general, such indices combine measured pollutant concentrations with health-based thresholds, producing a public-facing number. Higher numbers indicate more serious pollution and a greater need for caution.

03

How many monitoring areas recorded unhealthy or worse air quality, and how many recorded good, moderate, or unhealthy readings?

The report lists 29 monitoring areas with unhealthy or worse readings. That total includes 27 areas described as recording unhealthy readings, plus Larkin and Pasir Gudang, whose readings of 202 were very unhealthy. No station in the report reached the hazardous category, which begins above 300.

The remaining monitoring results were less severe. Twenty-seven areas recorded moderate API readings. Sarikei in Sarawak was the only station with good air quality, recording 50. The article therefore describes 57 areas with moderate, good, unhealthy, or worse readings: 29 unhealthy or worse, 27 moderate, and one good.

These totals show that unhealthy or worse readings were slightly more widespread than moderate readings in the listed results. The figures are a snapshot taken from the APIMS portal at the reported time. Conditions can change, so later readings could produce a different national distribution, although the article does not give a forecast or expected duration.

04

How does Malaysia classify air quality from good to hazardous, and where do the readings in this report fit within those categories?

Malaysia classifies API readings into five levels. Zero to 50 means good air quality, 51 to 100 means moderate, 101 to 200 means unhealthy, 201 to 300 means very unhealthy, and readings above 300 are hazardous. These bands help people interpret a number without needing to understand pollutant measurements.

The report places Sarikei's reading of 50 at the top end of the good category. Pahang stations fell into different levels: Temerloh recorded 139, which was unhealthy, while Rompin recorded 103, also unhealthy. Larkin and Pasir Gudang each recorded 202, crossing into the very unhealthy band by one point above 200.

Many other stations, including Johan Setia at 184 and Nilai at 181, were unhealthy but below the very unhealthy threshold. No reported station was moderate except those included in the article's total of 27, and none was hazardous. The classifications show how small numerical differences can move a reading into a more serious category.

05

What health effects can unhealthy and very unhealthy air have on people, especially children, older adults, and those with breathing problems?

Unhealthy air means pollution levels can harm health, especially for people whose lungs are still developing, are older, or already have breathing problems. Common effects can include coughing, throat irritation, wheezing, shortness of breath, and worsening asthma or other respiratory symptoms. Very unhealthy conditions raise the concern because exposure is more intense.

For example, the article reports an API of 202 in Larkin and Pasir Gudang. At that level, children may develop symptoms during outdoor activity, while older adults and people with asthma or other lung disease may experience aggravated breathing problems. Healthy adults can also feel irritation or discomfort, although effects differ between individuals.

The article reports readings and classifications but does not describe health effects or provide protective advice. These health effects are established public-health information, not details stated in the report. People who develop serious breathing difficulty should seek medical care. Local health guidance and later API readings would help determine appropriate precautions as conditions change.

06

Why can air-quality readings differ so much between nearby places such as Larkin, Pasir Gudang, and other Johor stations?

Air-quality readings can differ between nearby places because pollution is not spread evenly. Emissions may be stronger in one area, while wind, rainfall, temperature, and local terrain move or concentrate pollutants differently. Monitoring stations also measure conditions at their own exact locations, so they can capture different local air masses.

The Johor results illustrate this variation. Larkin and Pasir Gudang each recorded 202, placing them in the very unhealthy category. Pengerang recorded 181, Batu Pahat and Kota Tinggi each recorded 171, Kluang 168, Tangkak 159, and Segamat 156. The measurements therefore differed across the state's stations.

The article does not identify the pollution source, weather pattern, or distance between these stations, so it cannot explain the precise cause of each difference. The broader lesson is that one station's result should not automatically be applied to every nearby place. Local readings and their timing matter when assessing conditions.

07

What pollutants create haze, how do they enter the air, and how does the API turn their concentrations into a single number?

Haze is created mainly by fine particles suspended in the air, especially particulate matter such as PM2.5 and PM10, along with gases that can form additional particles. These pollutants can enter the atmosphere through fires, vehicle exhaust, industrial activity, power generation, and dust. The article reports the API results but does not identify which pollutants or sources caused this episode.

The API works by comparing measured pollutant concentrations with health-based reference levels. Each pollutant can be converted into a sub-index. The overall API commonly reflects the pollutant producing the highest health concern, rather than simply averaging every pollutant. This produces one number that people can compare with categories such as unhealthy or very unhealthy.

For this report, APIMS recorded 202 in Larkin and Pasir Gudang. The article does not provide the underlying concentrations or explain the calculation for those readings. The pollutant details and calculation method described here are established background knowledge. The index is useful for communication, but it does not replace the individual pollutant measurements.

This brief was written by AI from the original reporting and checked by other models. Names, figures and quotes come from the source; read it for full context.

Read more in the JupiteX app

Pulse is free. New stories every 4 hours, each one broken into the questions that explain it.

Or read more news on the web