Over 13 million Australians use AI every day, government report finds

AI tools are software systems that perform tasks often associated with human thinking, such as answering questions, finding information, offering advice, or creating content. Using them every day means relying on these tools regularly in personal, educational, or work-related routines. The article reports that 13.6 million Australians do this.

For example, someone might ask an AI tool for advice, use it to search for information, or request help generating written content for work or study. The tool processes a user’s request and produces an answer or other output. The report found that more than 60 per cent of respondents used AI for information and advice, while 39 per cent used it to generate content.

Daily AI use matters because it is already widespread, especially among working-age Australians. JSA acting commissioner Trevor Gauld said understanding AI-driven changes will help Australia prepare for future workforce opportunities and challenges.

Australia’s daily AI use is large in both absolute and proportional terms. Jobs and Skills Australia estimated that 13.6 million Australians use AI tools every day. This figure shows that AI is not limited to specialist technology users. It has become part of many people’s regular activities.

The strongest reported use appears in two prime working-age groups. Seventy-four per cent of Australians aged 25 to 34 reported using AI daily. Among people aged 35 to 49, the figure was 72 per cent. These percentages show that daily use is especially common among adults likely to be active in workplaces, education, and other responsibilities.

The report therefore links AI adoption closely with Australia’s working population. JSA said understanding changes driven by AI will be essential for preparing for workforce opportunities and challenges. The figures suggest that employers, workers, and educators will need to pay attention to how daily AI use affects tasks and skills.

The highest daily AI use in the report appears among Australians in prime working age. People aged 25 to 34 recorded the highest rate, with 74 per cent saying they used AI tools every day. This is the clearest age-group figure given in the report.

Australians aged 35 to 49 followed closely behind. Seventy-two per cent of people in this group reported daily AI use. The figures indicate that AI is particularly common among adults who may use digital tools across employment, study, and everyday tasks. The report does not provide daily-use percentages for every other age group.

These results matter because the two highest-use groups are central to the workforce. JSA acting commissioner Trevor Gauld said Australia needs to understand AI-driven shifts to prepare for future opportunities and challenges. The age pattern makes workplace change a key part of the discussion about AI adoption.

Australians are using AI for practical tasks rather than one single purpose. The report says more than 60 per cent of survey respondents used AI to seek information and advice. This suggests that many people treat AI as a convenient source of assistance in daily life.

Work and study are another important use. Thirty-nine per cent of respondents said they used AI to generate content related to work or study. For instance, a user might ask an AI tool to produce a draft or other material connected with an assignment or job task. The article does not specify the exact types of content created.

These uses show why AI matters beyond technology circles. People are already bringing it into learning and working routines. JSA acting commissioner Trevor Gauld said understanding these AI-driven shifts will help Australia prepare for future workforce opportunities and challenges. The report connects everyday use with broader changes in employment and skills.

Widespread AI use could change the balance between tasks people perform themselves and tasks supported by software. The article does not identify specific occupations or skills that will disappear. It does show that daily AI use is already common, especially among prime working-age Australians, making workforce effects an important issue.

For example, 39 per cent of survey respondents used AI to generate content for work or study. This suggests that some workers and learners are already using AI to support content-related tasks. The key mechanism is assistance: AI tools can provide information, advice, or generated material, which may alter how people complete familiar activities.

The future effect will depend on how workplaces and workers respond. JSA acting commissioner Trevor Gauld said understanding AI-driven shifts is essential for preparing for workforce opportunities and challenges. Australia therefore needs awareness of changing tasks and the skills needed to work alongside new tools.

AI can create opportunities when it helps people complete tasks, find information, or generate content. The Australian report shows that these uses are already common. More than 60 per cent of respondents used AI for information and advice, and 39 per cent used it to generate content for work or study.

The same mechanism can create challenges. When a tool changes how a task is done, workers may need to adjust their methods or build new capabilities. The article does not list particular jobs at risk or specify which new occupations may appear. It does establish that AI is driving shifts that matter for the workforce.

This mixed effect explains why preparation is important. AI may support productivity and new ways of working, but its spread can also require adaptation. JSA acting commissioner Trevor Gauld said understanding AI-driven changes will help Australia prepare for both future workforce opportunities and challenges.

Generative AI is a type of AI that produces new content, such as text, images, audio, or code. In general, it learns patterns from large collections of existing examples. It then uses those learned relationships to predict or assemble an output in response to a user’s request. This technical explanation comes from established knowledge beyond the article.

For example, a text system can receive a prompt and generate a paragraph by choosing likely words and arranging them into a coherent response. An image system can create a picture by applying learned visual patterns to a description. The result is newly generated content, rather than a simple copy of one stored example.

The article reports that 39 per cent of respondents used AI to generate content for work or study. It does not identify the systems used or explain their training methods. It does show that generative use is already part of everyday AI activity in Australia.