JupiteX Get the app
Politics & Governance23 Oct 2026 · about 7 min

Keralam SIR: LDF representatives walk out of all-party meet convened by Chief Electoral Officer

The brief

LDF representatives left the all-party meeting convened by Kerala Chief Electoral Officer D. Sajith Babu on October 23. They protested the exclusion of voters during the Special Intensive Revision. Their main demand was that all excluded names be restored to the electoral roll. This mattered because electoral-roll changes can affect people’s ability to participate in an election. CPI(M) leader M.V. Jayarajan and CPI leader Sathyan Mokeri said they asked officials to restore the names of 24.08 lakh voters. They also demanded more time for rationalising polling stations. The deadline was November 2. The CEO told party leaders he would convey both demands to the Election Commission of India. The CEO did not agree to restore the names directly and expressed helplessness, according to Jayarajan. The reported 24.08 lakh figure referred to the draft SIR list, not the final list. After excluded voters could enroll anew, the final difference fell to 8.97 lakh. The SSR process now provides another opportunity for claims and corrections.

01

What happened at the all-party meeting, and what were the LDF representatives demanding?

LDF representatives left the all-party meeting convened by Kerala Chief Electoral Officer D. Sajith Babu on October 23. They protested the exclusion of voters during the Special Intensive Revision. Their main demand was that all excluded names be restored to the electoral roll. This mattered because electoral-roll changes can affect people’s ability to participate in an election.

CPI(M) leader M.V. Jayarajan and CPI leader Sathyan Mokeri said they asked officials to restore the names of 24.08 lakh voters. They also demanded more time for rationalising polling stations. The deadline was November 2. The CEO told party leaders he would convey both demands to the Election Commission of India.

The CEO did not agree to restore the names directly and expressed helplessness, according to Jayarajan. The reported 24.08 lakh figure referred to the draft SIR list, not the final list. After excluded voters could enroll anew, the final difference fell to 8.97 lakh. The SSR process now provides another opportunity for claims and corrections.

02

What is a Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of an electoral roll?

A Special Intensive Revision, or SIR, is a detailed exercise to check and update an electoral roll. The article identifies house-to-house enumeration as the key step in Kerala’s SIR. It compares the existing roll with information collected during that exercise. The aim is to produce a more accurate list of voters before later electoral work.

In Kerala, the roll was frozen on October 27, 2025, with 2,78,50,855 voters. After enumeration, the draft SIR roll published on December 23 contained 2,54,42,352 voters. That was 24,08,503 fewer. Excluded voters then received an opportunity to enroll anew. The final SIR list, published on February 21, 2026, contained 2,69,53,644 voters.

Thus, SIR works through stages rather than one irreversible deletion. A draft list identifies changes, while a later opportunity allows people to seek enrollment. The final list still had 8,97,211 fewer voters than the earlier roll. The article does not provide a fuller formal definition of SIR.

03

How many voters were removed from Kerala’s draft SIR roll, and how many fewer voters remained in the final SIR roll compared with the earlier list?

Kerala had 2,78,50,855 voters when its electoral roll was frozen on October 27, 2025. After the house-to-house enumeration, the draft SIR roll published on December 23 contained 2,54,42,352 voters. The difference was 24,08,503 voters, or 24.08 lakh.

The final SIR list was published on February 21, 2026. It contained 2,69,53,644 voters. Compared with the October 2025 roll, that was a shortfall of 8,97,211 voters. Therefore, the draft figure and final figure describe different stages of the same revision process.

The distinction matters because political parties used the draft reduction of 24.08 lakh when making their demand at the all-party meeting. Election officials said the final difference was 8.97 lakh after excluded voters were given a chance to enroll anew. The roll later rose again to 2,71,42,952 voters on March 24, before the Assembly polls.

04

Why did the reported number of excluded voters fall from 24.08 lakh in the draft list to 8.97 lakh in the final list?

The 24.08 lakh figure came from comparing Kerala’s earlier roll with the draft SIR list. The earlier roll had 2,78,50,855 voters on October 27, 2025. The draft list, published on December 23 after house-to-house enumeration, had 2,54,42,352 voters. That produced a difference of 24,08,503.

The draft was not the final outcome. Excluded voters were given an opportunity to enroll anew. Some people evidently used that opportunity, so the number of voters increased before the final SIR list. On February 21, 2026, the final list had 2,69,53,644 voters. It was therefore only 8,97,211 below the earlier roll.

This explains the disagreement at the meeting. Political parties referred to the draft reduction of 24.08 lakh and demanded restoration of those names. Election officials said the relevant final reduction was 8.97 lakh. The figures measure two stages, so they are not contradictory counts of the same final outcome.

05

What could happen to citizens whose names are missing from the electoral roll when an election takes place?

If a citizen’s name is missing from the electoral roll when an election takes place, that person may be unable to vote in that election. The electoral roll is the official list used to identify eligible voters at polling stations. A voter may therefore lose the practical opportunity to participate unless the omission is corrected in time. This consequence is based on established election procedure; the article does not describe a specific polling-day case.

Kerala’s SIR shows why the stages matter. The draft list had 24,08,503 fewer voters than the earlier roll. Excluded voters were then given an opportunity to enroll anew, and the final shortfall became 8,97,211. The later SSR process also allows claims and complaints from November 12 to December 11.

These procedures create opportunities before an election to address missing names, incorrect details, or other roll problems. Under the SSR, Form 6 is used for new enrollment and Form 8 for corrections, including address changes. The final SSR list is scheduled for January 4, 2027, after claims are examined.

06

What roles do Kerala’s Chief Electoral Officer, the Election Commission of India, and political parties play in revising the electoral roll?

Kerala’s Chief Electoral Officer manages the revision process in the State and consults political parties. D. Sajith Babu convened the October 23 all-party meeting. He informed party leaders that he would convey their requests to the Election Commission of India. The CEO also announced the dates for the ongoing Special Summary Revision.

The ECI is the national authority to which the Kerala CEO forwards demands about the process. In this meeting, the CEO said he would convey requests to extend the November 2 polling-station rationalisation deadline and to address excluded names. The article reports that he expressed helplessness when asked to restore the names directly, but it does not state the ECI’s final decision.

Political parties represent concerns about voters and examine changes to the roll. LDF representatives walked out while demanding restoration of the 24.08 lakh names shown as excluded in the draft list. Parties also sought more time for polling-station rationalisation. Officials clarified that the final SIR shortfall was 8.97 lakh after re-enrollment.

07

How do electoral-roll revision procedures, such as claims, objections, and voter forms, help protect the principle that eligible citizens can participate in representative democracy?

Electoral-roll revision supports representative democracy by checking who is listed and giving people ways to challenge mistakes. An accurate roll should include eligible citizens and avoid incorrect, duplicate, or outdated entries. The article shows this process through Kerala’s SSR, which covers new enrollment, deletions, corrections, and polling-station rationalisation.

The procedures use specific forms. Form 6 is for new enrollment. Form 7 is used for deleting names of dead voters, people who have relinquished citizenship, and duplicated entries. Form 8 handles corrections, including address changes. Citizens can lodge claims and complaints from November 12 to December 11. Officials must examine and dispose of them by December 28, 2026.

These steps give affected people an opportunity to respond before the final roll is published. Kerala’s SIR illustrates why that matters: the draft shortfall was 24,08,503 voters, but the final shortfall fell to 8,97,211 after excluded voters could enroll anew. The final SSR list is scheduled for January 4, 2027.

This brief was written by AI from the original reporting and checked by other models. Names, figures and quotes come from the source; read it for full context.

Read more in the JupiteX app

Pulse is free. New stories every 4 hours, each one broken into the questions that explain it.

Or read more news on the web