JupiteX Get the app
Defence & Security24 Oct 2026 · about 7 min

Leonardo, Rheinmetall secure $4 billion contracts with Italian Army, report says

The brief

Leonardo and Rheinmetall reportedly agreed, through their joint venture, to supply the Italian Army with two major categories of armored equipment. The package includes A2CS combat vehicles and new-generation main battle tanks. The reported value of the two contracts combined is $4.16 billion. This is a major procurement decision for Italy’s defense modernization. The contracts cover different battlefield needs. A2CS vehicles are combat vehicles designed to move and protect soldiers while supporting operations. Main battle tanks are heavily protected, tracked vehicles built around powerful guns. Together, they would give the Army a mix of protected mobility and heavy armored firepower. The report does not provide quantities or delivery dates. The agreements were reported by Italy’s MF newspaper, but their signing was not confirmed. Leonardo CEO Lorenzo Mariani said communications had to be coordinated with clients. Rheinmetall declined to comment. Leonardo said its side was ready to enter production and was working on both programs.

01

What did Leonardo and Rheinmetall reportedly agree to supply to the Italian Army, and what is the total value of the two contracts?

Leonardo and Rheinmetall reportedly agreed, through their joint venture, to supply the Italian Army with two major categories of armored equipment. The package includes A2CS combat vehicles and new-generation main battle tanks. The reported value of the two contracts combined is $4.16 billion. This is a major procurement decision for Italy’s defense modernization.

The contracts cover different battlefield needs. A2CS vehicles are combat vehicles designed to move and protect soldiers while supporting operations. Main battle tanks are heavily protected, tracked vehicles built around powerful guns. Together, they would give the Army a mix of protected mobility and heavy armored firepower. The report does not provide quantities or delivery dates.

The agreements were reported by Italy’s MF newspaper, but their signing was not confirmed. Leonardo CEO Lorenzo Mariani said communications had to be coordinated with clients. Rheinmetall declined to comment. Leonardo said its side was ready to enter production and was working on both programs.

02

What are A2CS combat vehicles and main battle tanks, and how are they different?

A2CS combat vehicles and main battle tanks are both armored military platforms, but they serve different primary purposes. A2CS vehicles are generally intended to carry troops, protect them from battlefield threats, and support combat units with mobility and onboard weapons. The article does not define the A2CS acronym or specify the vehicle’s exact design.

Main battle tanks, or MBTs, are heavily armored fighting vehicles built around a large direct-fire gun. Their design emphasizes protection, firepower, and the ability to operate across difficult terrain. In simple terms, an A2CS vehicle usually helps move and support soldiers, while an MBT is optimized to confront heavily protected targets and hold or break through contested ground.

The reported Italian orders include both types because they offer complementary capabilities. The article calls the tanks new-generation MBTs but provides no technical details, numbers, or delivery schedule. Leonardo and Rheinmetall are working on both programs through their joint venture.

03

Who are Leonardo and Rheinmetall, and what role does their 50-50 joint venture play in these programs?

Leonardo and Rheinmetall are defense companies from Italy and Germany. The article presents Leonardo as the Italian participant and Rheinmetall as its German counterpart. In 2024, they launched a joint venture owned equally by both companies. That structure gives each partner a formal role in the programs rather than leaving one company as only a buyer or subcontractor.

The joint venture is working on the A2CS combat-vehicle program and the new-generation main battle tank program. Leonardo CEO Lorenzo Mariani said the program was ready to enter production from Leonardo’s side. He also said the companies were actively working on the tank program and the Future Combat System in close cooperation.

The current status remains partly unconfirmed publicly. MF reported two contracts worth $4.16 billion, but Mariani would not confirm whether they had been signed. Rheinmetall declined to comment. Even so, Leonardo’s comments indicate that cooperation and production planning are advancing.

04

How do these orders fit into Italy’s broader military modernization program and its planned Future Combat System?

Italy’s reported armored-vehicle orders fit into a broader effort to modernize its military equipment. The package would add A2CS combat vehicles and new-generation main battle tanks to the Italian Army. Modernization matters because armies must update major platforms over time, and armored vehicles form an important part of land-force equipment.

The orders also connect with Italy’s Future Combat System, or FCS. Leonardo CEO Lorenzo Mariani said the company was actively working on both the tank program and FCS in close cooperation with Rheinmetall. This links the immediate vehicle programs with a wider future-oriented defense effort, although the article gives no technical description or timetable for FCS.

The reported contracts therefore combine near-term production with longer-term cooperation. Leonardo said its program was ready to enter production from its side. However, the reported signing still required confirmation, and the companies had not publicly provided contract details beyond the reported total value.

05

What could the contracts change for the Italian Army’s equipment, industrial production, and ability to export defense products?

If completed, the reported contracts could give the Italian Army new A2CS combat vehicles and new-generation main battle tanks. That would support the equipment modernization described in the report. The article does not state which existing vehicles would be replaced, how many systems would arrive, or when deliveries would begin, so the precise military effect remains unclear.

Industrial production is another possible change. Leonardo said the program was ready to enter production from its side, while the joint venture is actively working on both the tank and Future Combat System programs. This suggests a shift from development and cooperation toward manufacturing, although the article does not identify factories, jobs, or production volumes.

Exports could also become more important. Mariani stressed the importance of tanks for Italy’s defense, for exports, and for the wider Rheinmetall partnership. The contracts could therefore create a platform for future export activity, but the article names no customers or export agreements.

06

Why might Italy develop armored vehicles and tanks through a joint venture instead of buying all of them directly from a foreign supplier?

A country may choose a joint venture to combine national industrial strengths, share development work, and keep closer control over an important defense program. In this case, Leonardo and Rheinmetall created an equally owned partnership in 2024. That arrangement gives Italy a direct industrial partner while connecting the project to a German defense company.

The mechanism is cooperation across the program, rather than a simple purchase. Leonardo says the partners are working together on the tank program and Future Combat System, and that its side is ready to enter production. A joint structure can also align the companies’ interests, because both own half of the venture. The article does not detail costs, technology sharing, or work allocation.

For Italy, the approach may support modernization, domestic production, and future exports. Mariani specifically stressed tanks’ importance for exports and for the broader Rheinmetall partnership. Still, the reported contracts had not been publicly confirmed as signed, so their final industrial impact is not yet established.

07

What roles do tanks and other armored combat vehicles perform in modern warfare, and why do armies still invest in them?

Tanks are heavily protected combat vehicles designed to move across difficult ground and deliver powerful direct fire. Other armored combat vehicles perform varied roles, including carrying troops, providing protected mobility, supporting attacks, and transporting weapons or equipment. The article does not describe these battlefield functions, so this explanation uses established military knowledge.

The basic mechanism is complementary capability. A tank combines armor, mobility, and a large gun to confront serious threats and support maneuvering forces. Armored combat vehicles can carry soldiers closer to dangerous areas while offering protection and battlefield support. Their exact roles depend on design, sensors, weapons, and how an army organizes them.

Armies continue investing in these platforms because land forces still need protected movement and concentrated firepower in contested environments. Italy’s CEO Lorenzo Mariani stressed tanks’ importance for defense modernization. The reported package pairs A2CS combat vehicles with new-generation MBTs, reflecting the value of using different armored systems together.

This brief was written by AI from the original reporting and checked by other models. Names, figures and quotes come from the source; read it for full context.

Read more in the JupiteX app

Pulse is free. New stories every 4 hours, each one broken into the questions that explain it.

Or read more news on the web