BREAKING: Government removes IGP Dan Bahadur Karki from post

Dan Bahadur Karki lost his position as Inspector General of Nepal Police after an emergency Cabinet meeting on Wednesday. This is a major change because the Inspector General leads the national police force. The decision moved Karki out of operational police command, although it gave him another senior security role.

The Cabinet appointed Karki as the prime minister’s security adviser. At the same time, the government assigned new responsibilities to Additional Inspector General Manoj KC. The minister who provided the information did not specify whether KC became acting Inspector General or received another command assignment.

The change means Nepal’s police leadership is being reorganized. Karki is no longer the police chief, but he remains involved in national security through his new advisory position. The article does not describe the reasons for his removal or explain the precise duties assigned to KC.

An Inspector General of Police is generally the highest-ranking professional officer in a national police organization. The position matters because it provides one command point for policing across the country. That leader helps set priorities, coordinate major operations, and maintain discipline and accountability throughout the force.

In Nepal’s case, the article identifies Dan Bahadur Karki as the Inspector General of Nepal Police. His removal therefore changed the force’s top leadership. The government also gave Additional Inspector General Manoj KC new responsibilities, showing that senior officers may be involved when command arrangements change.

The article does not list the Inspector General’s full legal powers or detailed duties. In practical terms, however, the position connects national policy with police operations. A change at the top can affect coordination, reporting lines, and the continuity of security work, even when the wider organization remains in place.

The article directly identifies the Cabinet as the body that removed Dan Bahadur Karki. It reports that an emergency Cabinet meeting held on Wednesday removed him from his duties. This makes the Cabinet the clearly documented decision-maker in this specific case.

The same report says the government assigned new responsibilities to Additional Inspector General Manoj KC. A minister told Kantipur about the decision. The article does not separately explain the full legal process for appointing or removing Nepal’s Inspector General, nor does it identify every official involved in that process.

Therefore, the safest answer from the source is that the Cabinet removed Karki and the government handled the related reassignment. Broader constitutional or statutory rules are not provided here. Those rules would require a separate authoritative source, so they should not be inferred from this short report.

The source does not provide the total size of Nepal Police. It gives no number for sworn personnel, civilian staff, regional commands, divisions, stations, or other units. Because those figures are absent, the force’s scale cannot be calculated from this report.

The article only establishes that Dan Bahadur Karki was the Inspector General of Nepal Police. That title indicates national-level leadership, but it does not reveal how many officers or units he oversaw. It also does not identify the force’s internal structure or geographic organization.

A reliable answer would need current official Nepal Police statistics or government records. Those figures can change as staffing and organizational arrangements change. For this article, the accurate conclusion is simply that the Inspector General led the national force, while its size and reporting structure were not stated.

Removing the Inspector General creates a change at the highest level of Nepal Police command. The former chief no longer directs the force in that role. Such a transition matters because senior officers need clear authority, reporting lines, and responsibility for ongoing police work.

In this case, an emergency Cabinet meeting removed Dan Bahadur Karki and assigned new responsibilities to Additional Inspector General Manoj KC. The article does not say that KC was formally appointed Inspector General. It also does not describe any additional appointments, interim arrangements, or changes below the top level.

The immediate reality is therefore a leadership transition, not a fully explained restructuring. Karki became the prime minister’s security adviser, while KC took on unspecified new responsibilities. Further official decisions would be needed to clarify who holds day-to-day command and how the chain of command will operate.

Dan Bahadur Karki was appointed chief of Nepal Police on November 10, 2025. The government removed him during an emergency Cabinet meeting reported on November 4, 2026. Based on those dates, he served for almost one year, although the article does not give an exact number of days.

Karki succeeded Chandra Kuber Khapung as Nepal Police chief. The succession places Karki’s appointment in a continuing leadership sequence rather than presenting him as the force’s first chief. The article gives no additional details about Khapung’s tenure or the circumstances of the earlier change.

Karki’s removal ended that period of leadership before the one-year anniversary of his appointment. He was not simply retired from public security work; the Cabinet appointed him the prime minister’s security adviser. The report does not state who will permanently succeed him as Inspector General.

Leading a national police force means holding operational authority over a countrywide law-enforcement organization. The police chief manages the force’s senior command, priorities, and administration. A prime minister’s security adviser has a narrower, advisory focus: helping the prime minister assess and respond to security matters.

The article illustrates the difference through Karki’s reassignment. He was removed as Inspector General of Nepal Police and appointed the prime minister’s security adviser. Manoj KC, an Additional Inspector General, was given new responsibilities, although the report does not specify whether those included acting command of the force.

Karki therefore shifted from leading the police organization to advising the head of government. The two roles may both involve national security, but their functions are different. The first is a command position inside the police; the second is an advisory position serving the prime minister. The article gives no further details about Karki’s new duties.