Why RSS smells a ‘conspiracy’ in Gen Z protests despite ‘genuine grievances’

Dattatreya Hosabale said the protests could involve more than ordinary public anger. He claimed “anarchic forces” were trying to provoke young people and create unrest, both from within India and outside it. Based on experiences in other countries, he said there might be a conspiracy behind the protests.

Hosabale did not reject every youth protest. He said young people may be responding to injustice, unemployment, examination paper leaks, or other social problems. They have the right to demand administrative action. The key distinction was between legitimate protest and efforts to divide society or encourage violence.

He argued that democracy allows regimes to change through elections. It also requires positive dialogue with the new generation. Hosabale said the RSS opposes political actors misusing youth anger for self-interest, while urging well-meaning people to speak out against unrest and violence.

In Hosabale’s account, “anarchic forces” are actors that try to provoke people, create unrest, divide society, or encourage violence. He said such forces may operate within India or outside it. He also warned that political self-interest could misuse public anger and allow these forces to dominate.

Young people with genuine grievances are different. Hosabale said they may protest injustice affecting themselves or society. Their concerns include unemployment and examination paper leaks. He said they have ideas about improving society and the right to seek administrative action. Protest itself does not make them anti-national.

The practical distinction is how anger is channelled. Hosabale called for listening and positive dialogue with young people. He opposed violence and division, while saying well-meaning citizens should speak out. In his view, organised civic voices can prevent anarchic forces from becoming dominant.

The article describes several sources of youth discontent. RSS leaders discussed unemployment and examination paper leaks as major concerns. Hosabale also referred to young people protesting injustice, whether it affected them personally or society more broadly. He said governments and societies should pay attention to their aspirations and problems.

A separate dispute concerns the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision, or SIR, of electoral rolls. The exercise became a political firestorm because of alleged irregularities. Political parties questioned the process, while Hosabale said they should establish the facts before protesting. He nevertheless defended electoral-roll revision as important.

These issues matter because they can turn personal frustration into wider political action. Hosabale supported dialogue and administrative responses to genuine problems. He warned, however, that protests should not be used to divide society, pursue political self-interest, or resort to violence.

The Special Intensive Revision, or SIR, is the Election Commission’s process of revising electoral rolls. The article presents it as an exercise intended to examine and update the lists of voters. Hosabale defended the process while acknowledging that it had become a major political controversy.

He cited specific reasons for revision. Electoral rolls may contain entries for people who have died or duplicate entries for the same person. He also said that including non-citizens would raise concerns for the country’s security. These examples explain why the RSS general secretary considers the exercise important.

Political parties are entitled to pursue their agendas in a democracy, Hosabale said. However, he argued that they should first examine whether complaints about SIR are true. The article does not provide the process’s timetable, geographic coverage, or detailed rules, so those details cannot be established here.

The article gives no total number for the electoral roll discussed. Therefore, its scale cannot be determined from the provided text. It only identifies the roll as the subject of the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision, or SIR.

Hosabale named several types of entries that may be problematic. These include people who have died, duplicate entries, and non-citizens included in the rolls. The article says the revision is meant to address such issues, but it does not describe how many entries fall into each category.

This missing figure matters because the size of a roll helps readers understand the potential reach of the exercise. Still, the article’s central point is about accuracy and eligibility, not a stated total. Any precise number would require information not supplied in the source text.

Electoral rolls are important because they identify who is included in the voting system. If they contain deceased voters, duplicate entries, or non-citizens, questions can arise about the accuracy and fairness of the process. The article does not quantify the effect on any election or describe a specific disputed result.

Hosabale used these possible entries to defend the need for SIR. Deceased and duplicate records can make the rolls less reliable. He separately said that including non-citizens would be a concern for the country’s security. Political parties, he argued, should establish the facts before protesting the revision.

The likely consequence described by the article is heightened political and social concern around the rolls. Accurate records could support confidence, while unresolved allegations could deepen mistrust. The source does not state a specific remedy beyond revision and fact-based discussion.

The article presents elections as the proper route for changing a government or regime. Hosabale said people may pursue political objectives, but democracy provides elections for that purpose. This separates lawful political change from attempts to create unrest or violence in society.

Citizens can also protest genuine injustice and demand administrative action. Hosabale said young people should not simply remain at home when they face real problems. They may raise concerns about themselves or society, offer ideas for improvement, and ask authorities to respond. Dialogue helps governments understand those demands.

The article says these methods work best when protests remain focused on grievances and do not become tools for division or political manipulation. Hosabale called for positive dialogue with the new generation. He also urged well-meaning people to speak out, arguing that public engagement can restrain anarchic forces.